Liber Trigrammaton subFigura XXVII by Crowley. Original key entry by Fr. H.B. in New York 1/23/90 e.v. ASCII conversion by Bill Heidrick, T.G. of O.T.O. The purpose of this thread is to note some observations made in regard to Liber Trigrammaton (Liber XXVII), and to ask some questions about it. Liber Trigrammaton. (English Alphabet Attributions – Class B). Here is Nothing under its three forms. It is not, yet informeth all things. E – The Triple Light, the.
|Published (Last):||1 November 2010|
|PDF File Size:||15.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.73 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But there had to be a decision made regarding Nuit and Hadit, and AC may have made that one, harmonizing the frigrammaton with all the other occurrences in CCXX, and making the rhymes work better.
A letter F is crossed out, but for what purpose? It is not, yet informeth all things.
What would be your actual source for saying that A. Liber Trigrammatton conveniently falls upon one sheet which, when folded, forms a signature of the book. He may have been unsatisfied rather early on, and began to swap around some letters, then never finished the task, and gave away the Windram copy, which raises trogrammaton slight possibility that it was Windram himself who overwrote the letters originally put there by AC.
The lush gold printing symbolised Tiphareth trigrammwton Crowleys Master of the Temple status. The light is mine; its rays consume Me: The sum of the numbers in the Cipher is By all of the available evidence, and Mr. In Kaczynski, Richard and Thiebes, Joseph. Thelemites believe the book of the law should ideally only be printed in Crowley’s hand-written version, because the books says there are messages in the chance shapes Crowley’s handwriting made, or any shapes he adds to the pages.
Liber Trigrammaton Sub Figura XXVII
Crowley later attributed the 26 letters of the English alphabet to these trigrams, in an attempt to fulfill an injunction found in his earlier work The Book of the Lawor Liber AL vel Legis.
The text included specific instructions for the preparation of a standard printed book that reflected its contents. Proofs survive from September Would he write it in his diaries? And actually, that has been the case since the beginning, for after all, Crowley was the one who invented the classification in the first place.
The winged globe, the starry blue, Are mine, o Ankh-f-n-khonsu! If all versions of CCXX are considered as the same instance of the SV, and all versions of the POTS as the same instance of that version, then there have been two appearances of Fill and only one appearance of Kill in print. Annotated by the Beast.
Liber Trigrammaton Decoded
And what the lack of correction in his CCXX indicates. Book of Mutations release threefold31 March 11th, My tome is finally available: So none of these can be taken as indicative of the contents of trigrqmmaton VB. Both Gillis and Stratton-Kent met with Joel Love in and were mutually surprised to find that both Love’s and Gillis’ work contained many striking parallels.
But there is no evidence as to when he wrote in it.
Soft C, P — The Mother. If we conclude that both scenarios are equally likely, then they cancel each other out, and provide no argument one way or the other.
It shows evidence that at that particular moment, AC wanted the word to be Kill, not Fill. So I went to —. And he did not bother at all to request that Fill be changed to Kill. The master flamed forth as a star and set a guard of Water in every Abyss. The choices are simply undecidable. And a crust of earth concealed the core of flame.
To arrive at the grand total of Liber CCXX with two simple formulas taken from the numbers of the Cipher is powerful evidence that this gematria is correct. Like clockwork threefold31 February 23rd, One way to interface with the transitional triad circuit is to imagine a clockface.
This suggests that this document may be considered a published, or at least circulated, edition of the text. The proof given by the grid was noted some time after the order and value was originally worked out by James Lees.
It does seem a little odd that in he would refer to a document that the reader could not have access to. Were there copies of the Holy Books that had the letters printed in them? So from what authority is this Class A text being changed?
This section does not cite any sources. The only definition of Class A has now become: