Site Overlay


Una àrea de Brodmann és una regió de la citoarquitectura de l’escorça « Clasificación Funcional» (en español). «Áreas de Brodmann» (en español). Área de Brodmann é uma região do córtex cerebral definida com base nas suas estruturas de associação também são consistentemente localizadas nas mesmas áreas de Brodmann pela imagem funcional neurofisiológica (por exemplo. El área 25 de Brodmann (BA25) es una zona de la corteza cerebral del cerebro y se define en dirige específicamente al área 46 de Brodmann, porque esta área tiene conectividad funcional intrínseca (correlación negativa) con el área

Author: Kakree Vigrel
Country: India
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 25 March 2016
Pages: 143
PDF File Size: 20.70 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.54 Mb
ISBN: 335-8-89190-434-7
Downloads: 66121
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dakazahn

Enviado por Neurocirurgia flag Denunciar.

Área de Brodmann

On a theo- retical level, EEG monitors a larger area of the cerebral cortex and does not require time aver- aging of signals. However, Fava et al.

Fewer shunts were placed using this protocol than if EEG were used independently. SSEPs recorded simultaneously from the precentral and postcentral gyri exhibit typical responses of reversed polarity Fig.

The evoked potential from the precentral gyrus is a biphasic positive-negative waveform, com- pared with the mirror image of the postcentral gyrus, which is negative-positive. The precise etiology of these potentials and phase reversal is not fully understood.

Phase reversal across the central sulcus in response to contralateral median nerve stimulation. The brldman in polarity is evident when comparing leads 2 and 3, positions that bridge the central sulcus darkened for emphasis.


Área 25 de Brodmann – Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

This region at least partially contributes to the generation of the N20 wave. SSEPs may also be recorded at the spinal level to monitor for insult to neurological tissues dur- ing spinal surgery, assuming that brofman location of peripheral stimulation is optimized to assess the level of cord at risk during a particular proce- dure Fig. SSEP monitoring is commonly used during a number of spinal procedures, including correction of scoliosis, resection of spinal AVM or tumor, therapeutic embolization of spinal AVMs, correction of spinal instability, and therapy for syringomyelia.

Changes in spinal SSEP after the placement of hardware can suggest a funclonales for changes in positioning of the ee. Electrodes may be placed in the sub- arachnoid or epidural space, on the interspinous ligament, or attached to a spinous process.

With the exception of subarachnoid leads, these araes may be placed percutaneously or at the site of surgical exposure. Recording evoked potentials at the spinal level has some advantages over cor- tically recorded SSEPs. Spinal evoked potentials have larger amplitudes, and repetition rates may be increased which can reduce acquisition time. While median nerve stimulation has been commonly used for monitoring SSEP during cervical spine procedures, caudal portions of the cervical cord may not receive appropriate coverage with this modality.

Área de Brodmann – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre

The ulnar nerve may offer more complete representation of lower cervical levels. For procedures placing the thoracic or lumbar cord at risk, SSEPs generated through the posterior tibial or common per- oneal brodan can be used.


Left and right median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in a patient who underwent laminectomy and exposure of an intradural, intramedullary tumor of the cervical spine.

The right P14 waveform is initially diminished at baseline and then is permanently lost during the midline myelotomy. Left-sided tracings are unaffected. The patient awoke with a permanent right hemi-proprioceptive loss.

However, if only lower extremity responses were lost in this case, the surgeon would be more suspicious of injury to the thoracic cord. The rate of false-negatives was remarkably low in this survey 0.

However, larger trials have not demonstrated similar consistency. Falsely positive SSEP changes are relatively common [10]. Further, false-negative recordings have been described. Confound- ingly, recordings may show improvement dur- ing a case without correlation to post-operative neurological improvement.

Positive changes to SSEP waveforms may reassure the surgeon intraoperatively, while several studies have demonstrated that improvement of SSEP ampli- tude.